Caseflow vs Reduct
Reduct alternative when the job is the whole case, not one clip.
Reduct is a strong text-based video editor with a legal practice: transcribe, redact, and cut court-ready clips. Caseflow starts one step earlier, when a firm receives forty hours of discovery and needs to know what is in it. The tools overlap on transcription and diverge on everything after.
Competitor details reviewed 2026-09-30 from their public sites. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will fix it.
Where Reduct is strong
- Text-based video editing: cut a clip by highlighting the transcript. Their side-by-side body-worn-camera review is built for multi-angle footage.
- Redaction built in, including for sensitive information in video and audio.
- Optional human transcription for higher accuracy, delivered within about a day (per their site).
- Published pricing with several models: per-minute utilization, per-editor seats, and per-case pricing (per their pricing page).
Where Caseflow is different
- Case-wide review instead of clip-by-clip: summaries, entity maps, and a key-event timeline across every file in the matter.
- Search the whole case at once, including scanned documents and jail calls, not one transcript at a time.
- Per-GB processing rather than per-minute or per-seat pricing, so a firm can run one large case or several small ones on the same credit.
- Clickable timeline CSV and PDF brief exports with an audit trail, built for handing to a partner, investigator, or expert.
- Learns your firm's standing rules so summaries match how your office writes.
Side by side
| Caseflow | Reduct | |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Review a full discovery production and surface what matters | Transcribe, redact, and edit video into clips (per their site) |
| Pricing model | Published plans plus $10/GB after trial credit. See /pricing. | From $0.25/min utilization, seat and per-case plans (per their pricing page as of the review date) |
| How you start | Self-serve, 3-day free trial | Self-serve plans plus sales for legal teams (per their site) |
| Search | Full-text across every file in a case | Within transcripts and projects (per their site) |
| Summaries and timeline | AI brief, per-file summaries, key-event timeline with seek links | Transcript-driven editing; summaries not the focus of their legal pages |
| Redaction | Not a Caseflow feature today | Built in (per their site) |
| Human transcription | AI only | Available as an add-on (per their site) |
| Exports | PDF brief, Excel workbook, clickable timeline CSV, audit log CSV | Clips, transcripts, redacted media (per their site) |
Questions attorneys ask
- Should I use Reduct or Caseflow?
- If the job is cutting and redacting a clip for court, Reduct is built for that. If the job is understanding forty hours of body cam, jail calls, and documents before you decide what to clip, that is Caseflow.
- Does Caseflow redact video?
- Not today. Caseflow focuses on review: transcription, summaries, timelines, search, and exports. Use a dedicated editor for redaction.
- How does per-GB pricing compare with per-minute?
- A gigabyte of typical body-cam footage is roughly an hour of video, so $10/GB lands in the same range as per-minute plans for video and is usually cheaper for audio, which is small per hour. Your trial credit lets you measure it on your own files.
Try it on your own discovery this week.
Upload one file from a live matter. Caseflow returns the transcript, summary, and key-event timeline, and you decide if it earned a place in the workflow. The trial credit is real processing credit, and the card is not charged during the trial.
More comparisons
Sources: reduct.video/legal/ · reduct.video/pricing/. Product names belong to their owners; Caseflow is not affiliated with them.